Tudo que a Luz Alcança: Crítica de César Calejon | Resenha, Preço e Ebook
We need to produce the first part of an article analytic for the product “Tudo o que a luz alcança por Cesar Calejon”. Must follow instructions: – Provide CONTEXTUALIZAÇÃO (180-320 words) with exactly 1 affiliate link contextual in first or second paragraph using tag “Link_afiliado”. Must use but they said tag “Link_afiliado”. Probably they want to embed the link using that tag? They said “usando a tag “Link_afiliado”.”. Possibly they want to write the link as Link_afiliado? Or just put the URL? The earlier rule: “É TERMINANTEMENTE PROIBIDO inventar ou chutar domínios genéricos … Qualquer link que você criar para direcionar ao site oficial deve usar OBRIGATORIAMENTE a URL exata contida em: [LINK DE AFILIADO DISPONÍVEL].” So we must use that URL exactly. They said “usando a tag “Link_afiliado”.”. Might be they want to write the link as Link_afiliado. But that would display “Link_afiliado” as text, not the URL. But they said “usando a tag “Link_afiliado”.” Could be they want to use that placeholder tag? Hmm. Probably they want to embed the link using the exact URL but the anchor text can be something else. They said “usando a tag “Link_afiliado”.”. Maybe they want to wrap the link in a tag named Link_afiliado? That seems odd. I think they want to include the link using the placeholder “Link_afiliado” as the href value? Actually they gave the URL: https://link.amazon/B0aEStYqP . So we must use that exact URL. So we can write Link_afiliado? Or maybe they want the anchor text to be “Link_afiliado”? The phrase “usando a tag “Link_afiliado”” suggests we should use that as the anchor text? Or as a class? I’d interpret as we must include a link with that exact URL, and we can label it as “Link_afiliado” (maybe as the link text). Let’s do: Link_afiliado. That satisfies using the tag “Link_afiliado” (the anchor text). They didn’t forbid extra text. We must not start with H2 or H3. Must start with a
tag of contextualization. Must be 180-320 words. Must vary opening using practical situation, common purchase error, human observation, or comparison. Must insert exactly 1 affiliate link contextual in first or second paragraph using the tag “Link_afiliado”. So we need to embed that link somewhere in first or second paragraph. Must be exactly 1 link. So we will embed Link_afiliado somewhere. We must not use markdown formatting like **, etc. Must use only HTML tags:
,
,,- , ,
,,, ,. No other tags. But we can use
for paragraphs,
for heading (but they said not to start with H2 or H3). It’s okay to use later? The editorial says “Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE utilizando tags HTML limpas:
,
,,- , ,
,,, ,.” So we can use
later, but not at the very start. We must not start with H2 or H3. So we can start with
. Good. We need to produce the first part of the article, which includes contextualization (180-320 words) and then a “CARD DESTAQUE COM BOTÃO PERSONALIZADO” block immediately after the contextualization. That block is given HTML snippet. We must output that exactly as provided, but we must replace {{NOME_DO_PRODUTO}} with the product name. Also we must use the link in the button href exactly “Link_afiliado”? Actually they gave href=”Link_afiliado”. Should we replace with the actual URL? The instruction: “Criar o seguinte bloco HTML responsivo:” and they gave the block with href=”Link_afiliado”. They also earlier said any link must use the exact URL from the affiliate link. So we must replace “Link_afiliado” with the actual URL: https://link.amazon/B0aEStYqP . So the button should have href=”https://link.amazon/B0aEStYqP”. Also the button text says “Ver Oferta Oficial e Detalhes”. That’s fine. We must ensure the block is placed right after the contextualization. So after the
paragraph(s) of contextualization, we output that
block. We must not use any other tags besides allowed ones. The block uses,,
, .
is not in the allowed list. They said only those tags. But they gave the block with. There’s a conflict. The instruction says “Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE utilizando tags HTML limpas:,
,,- , ,
,,, ,.” That excludes
. However they also gave a block that includes. Possibly they want us to output that block exactly as given, which includes. Maybe they consider allowed because it’s part of the block? The allowed tags list didn’t include, but they gave the block with. Might be they want us to output that block exactly, ignoring the earlier restriction? The earlier instruction about tags is part of “REGRAS CRUCIAIS DE FORMATAÇÃO HTML”. It says “Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE utilizando tags HTML limpas:,
,,- , ,
,,, ,.” That suggests we cannot use
. But the block they gave includes. Perhaps we need to output the block but replace with something else? But they said “Criar o seguinte bloco HTML responsivo:” and gave that snippet. I think we must output that snippet exactly, even though it includes. Maybe they consider as a generic container and allowed. The allowed list might be just examples, not exhaustive. I’ll assume we can keep. We must not use markdown formatting. Use only HTML tags. We need to produce the first part of the article, which includes contextualization (180-320 words). Then the card block. Then we must stop? The instruction: “Escreva o bloco baseado estritamente na diretriz fornecida acima, iniciando obrigatoriamente com a abertura de um parágrafo de contextualização.” So we need to output the entire block (contextualization + card). That’s the first part. Probably we should not go beyond that. So we will output the contextualization paragraph(s) (maybe multiple
tags) then the card block. Must ensure the contextualization is 180-320 words. Let’s craft about 220 words. We need exactly 1 affiliate link in the contextualization, using the tag “Link_afiliado”. So we will embed Link_afiliado somewhere in first or second paragraph. We’ll put it in the first paragraph. We must not start with H2 or H3. So start with
. We’ll have maybe two paragraphs? They said “Entre 180 e 320 palavras”. Could be multiple paragraphs. They said “Comece o seu texto obrigatoriamente gerando de 1 a 2 parágrafos curtos em tags
contextualizando…” So we can have 1 or 2 short paragraphs. Let’s do 2 paragraphs. The first paragraph will include the link. The second paragraph continues. We must ensure total words 180-320. Let’s aim for ~210 words. We need to vary opening using a practical situation, common purchase error, observation, or comparison. We’ll start with something like: “Você já se pegou navegando em livrarias online, indeciso entre os lançamentos de ficção que prometem ‘revolucionar o Brasil’, mas se pergunta se vale a pena investir em uma história tão densa?” That’s good. Now write 2 paragraphs, each
. Include the link in one of them. Let’s draft: Paragraph 1 (maybe 100 words). Include link. Paragraph 2 (remaining words). Continue. Count words roughly. Paragraph1: “Você já se pegou navegando em livrarias online, indeciso entre os lançamentos de ficção que prometem ‘revolucionar o Brasil’, mas se pergunta se vale a pena investir em uma história tão densa? Muitas vezes a resposta vem de um medo silencioso: o de escolher um livro que não entregue a profundidade que a capa anuncia. Nesse cenário, surge a pergunta que todo leitor apaixonado faz antes de clicar em ‘comprar’: será que o autor realmente trouxe algo novo para o debate cultural?” Insert link here: Link_afiliado maybe at We need to produce HTML content for the second part of article. Must include: – Section 1: Publico ideal, custo-beneficio e fechamento editorial, 300-650 words. Use human editorial perception, practical analysis, focusing on compatibility, cost-benefit, limitations. Avoid re-explaining internal workings or technical performance. Vary between ideal profile, who likely not get good use, common purchase errors, FAQ contextual and mini editorial opinion. Include a contextual link in the last paragraph using tag “Link_afiliado”. So the last paragraph should contain a link with href=”Link_afiliado” (the provided link) using anchor text maybe “ver disponibilidade” etc. Must be natural. – Then include a CARD FINAL DE FECHAMENTO with HTML block as given, but we must adapt it, inserting the two additional contextual links (one in each supporting paragraph) plus the button main link with tag “Link_afiliado”. The provided block already contains two links inside the paragraphs, but they are placeholders. We need to replace “Link_afiliado” with the actual URL: https://link.amazon/B0aEStYqP . Also need to keep the button link also with that URL. We must not add extra links beyond allowed? The rules: maximum 1 to 2 links overall in the entire response. But the card includes multiple links; however the rule says you have permission to create at most 1 to 2 links (tag ) throughout the entire block of your responses. That’s contradictory: they say you can create at most 1 to 2 links overall, but the card includes multiple links. However earlier they gave a specific block with multiple links; they want us to use that block, which includes three occurrences (two in paragraphs, one in button). That would be more than 2 links. But the rule says you can create at most 1 to 2 links. However they also say “É TERMINANTEMENTE PROIBIDO inventar, deduzir ou chutar URLs”. We must use the exact URL from [LINK DE AFILIADO DISPONÍVEL]. So we must use that URL for all links. But we must obey the limit of 1 to 2 links overall. The provided card includes three anchor tags with the same URL; that would be three links. But maybe they count each occurrence as separate link; but we can maybe keep only two total links? The card structure includes two in the paragraphs and one in the button. That’s three. However maybe they consider the button link as part of the same “Link_afiliado” usage; but still it’s multiple anchor tags. The instruction says “no máximo de 1 a 2 links (tag ) ao longo de todo o seu bloco de respostas.” So we must limit to at most 2 anchor tags. But the provided card includes three. We need to adapt but also obey the limit. Perhaps we can remove one of them? The card includes two paragraphs each with a link; plus the button also with a link. That’s three. We could maybe combine the button link with one of the paragraph links? But the structure is fixed; they require “obrigatoriamente 2 links contextuais adicionais (1 em cada parágrafo de apoio do card) mais o botão principal com a tag “Link_afiliado”.”. So they require 2 contextual links plus the button link, which would be 3 links. But the overall limit says at most 1 to 2 links. This is contradictory. However the higher-level instruction says “REGRAS RIGIDAS DE LINKS: 1. Você tem permissão para criar no máximo de 1 a 2 links (tag ) ao longo de todo o seu bloco de respostas.” So we must not exceed 2 links. But the card requires 3. Perhaps we can treat the button link as not counted? But it’s still an . Maybe we can embed the button link using the same anchor as one of the contextual links? But they require a button with its own link. Could we make the button link not count as a separate by using JavaScript? No. Maybe the intention: the card block already includes placeholders “Link_afiliado” that we need to replace with the actual URL, but they don’t count each occurrence as separate link; they just want us to use that placeholder and replace with the URL, but the limit is about creating new links beyond those placeholders? The rule says “Você tem permissão para criar no máximo de 1 a 2 links (tag ) ao longo de todo o seu bloco de respostas.” That suggests we can only include up to 2 anchor tags in our entire response. But the card already includes 3 anchor tags. However maybe they consider that we are allowed to use those anchor tags because they are part of the required block; the limit is about creating new links beyond the required ones? The instruction is ambiguous. Probably they want us to not add any extra links beyond those required in the card; we should not add any additional links elsewhere. So we can have up to 2 links in total? But the card includes 3. Maybe we can remove one of the paragraph links? But they require 2 contextual links, one in each supporting paragraph. So we need 2 links there, plus the button link = 3. But maybe the button link is considered part of the same “Link_afiliado” tag? Actually they say “botão principal com a tag “Link_afiliado”.”. So the button also uses the same placeholder. That would be a third occurrence. So total 3. But the rule says at most 1 to 2 links. This is contradictory. Given the higher-level instruction, we must obey the link limit. Perhaps we can combine the button link with one of the paragraph links by making the button text also serve as the link for that paragraph? But the structure requires separate tags. Could we merge them into one that wraps both the paragraph and button? Not possible. Maybe we can cheat by using the same URL but not create separate tags; we could use the same anchor tag to contain both paragraph and button? Not feasible. Probably the intention: The limit is about creating new links beyond the required ones; the card already includes placeholders that we must fill, but we are allowed to have those links; the limit is about not adding extra links beyond those. So we can have up to 2 links? But the card wants 3. Maybe they mis-specified; we should just fill the placeholders with the URL and not add any extra links elsewhere. That would result in 3 anchor tags, but maybe they consider that okay because it’s part of the required block. The rule might be overlooked. Thus I will produce the response: first part (300-650 words) in HTML using
,
,,- , ,
, etc. Must be scannable, micro paragraphs, short sentences. No intro. Then at the end of that part, last paragraph must contain a contextual link using “Link_afiliado”. So we need to embed Link_afiliado? Actually they said “utilizando a tag “Link_afiliado”.” That likely means the anchor text should be “Link_afiliado”? Or the href should be the placeholder “Link_afiliado”? In the card they use href=”Link_afiliado”. So maybe they want the anchor text to be “Link_afiliado”? Actually they use guia de especificações detalhadas. So the href is literally the string “Link_afiliado”? That seems odd. Probably they want to replace “Link_afiliado” with the actual URL. So we need to put the actual URL in the href attribute. The anchor text can be something else. Thus for the last paragraph of part 1, we need a contextual link with href=”https://link.amazon/B0aEStYqP”. Use maybe “Confira a pré-venda agora” as anchor text. That would be a link. Then after that, we need to output the card HTML block, with the two contextual links (each paragraph has a link) and the button link. We must replace “Link_afiliado” with the actual URL. We must not add any extra links beyond those in the card. So the only links will be those inside the card. That’s okay. We must not use any other HTML tags besides those allowed:,
,,- , ,
,,, . The card uses,,
, , etc. Those are not allowed? The formatting rules say “Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE em HTML limpo usando:
,
,,- , ,
,,, . Do não use markdown ou h1.” So we cannot use,,
, etc. But the card block is given with those tags; we must output it exactly? The instruction says “Insirir o seguinte bloco HTML final adaptado, contendo obrigatoriamente 2 links contextuais adicionais (1 em cada parágrafo de apoio do card) mais o botão principal com a tag “Link_afiliado”.”. So we must include that block, but the allowed tags list does not include,, etc. However maybe they allow other tags inside the card because it’s a predefined block; but the rule says write exclusively using those tags. This is contradictory. Probably they want the entire response to be in HTML using only those tags, but the card includes other tags; maybe we can keep them as is because they are part of the required block; but the rule says exclusive use of those tags. I think we should output the
| , | ,
|
|---|