Avaliação Técnica: Comentário Exegético de Josué
We need to produce the first part of article: Contextualização (180-320 words) with exactly 1 affiliate link using tag “Link_afiliado”? Actually instruction: “Inserir exatamente 1 link afiliado contextual no primeiro ou segundo parágrafo usando a tag “Link_afiliado”.” But earlier they said “Link_afiliado” is placeholder? In earlier they said “using the tag “Link_afiliado”.” Probably they want to embed the link using the placeholder “Link_afiliado”? Actually they said “Inserir exatamente 1 link afiliado contextual no primeiro ou segundo parágrafo utilizando a tag “Link_afiliado”.”. So we need to put a link with the text “Link_afiliado”? Or they want to use the placeholder “Link_afiliado”? Hmm ambiguous. In earlier rules they said “Any link that you create to direct to the official site must use OBRIGATORIAMENTE the exact URL contained in: [LINK DE AFILIADO DISPONÍVEL]”. So we must use that exact URL. So we need to embed that URL somewhere as a link. They also say “using the tag “Link_afiliado”.”. Probably they want to embed the link like Link_afiliado? But that would be just the placeholder text. But they also said “It is TERMINANTELY PROIBIDO inventar ou chutar dom\u00ednios gen\u00e9ricos”. So we must use the exact URL given: https://link.amazon/B0chiJW9c . So we can embed that as a link. They also said “using the tag “Link_afiliado”.” Maybe they want to use the anchor text “Link_afiliado”? But that would be weird. Could be they want to use the placeholder “Link_afiliado” as the href attribute? Actually they said “using the tag “Link_afiliado”.”. Could be they want to use the anchor tag with class or something? But earlier they said “Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE utilizando tags HTML limpas:
,
,,- , ,
,,, ,.” So we can use Link_afiliado maybe. That would satisfy “using the tag Link_afiliado”? Not sure. But they said “Inserir exatamente 1 link afiliado contextual no primeiro ou segundo parágrafo utilizando a tag “Link_afiliado”.”. So we need to embed the link with anchor text “Link_afiliado”? Or maybe they want to use the literal string “Link_afiliado” as the href? That would be invalid. I think they want to use the placeholder “Link_afiliado” as the link text, but also need to use the actual URL. Possibly they want something like Link_afiliado. That uses the tag “Link_afiliado” as the anchor text. That seems plausible. Thus in the contextualization paragraph(s), we need exactly 1 affiliate link, placed in first or second paragraph, using anchor text “Link_afiliado”. So we will write something like: “Se você já se perguntou como escolher um comentário bíblico que realmente aprofunde sua leitura, a resposta pode estar aqui. Saiba mais em Link_afiliado.” That would be the link. We need exactly 180-320 words for contextualization. Must be between 180 and 320 words inclusive. Must start with a
tag. No H2 or H3. Must be micro paragraphs (max 3 lines). Use short sentences. Must vary opening using practical situation, common buying error, human observation or comparison. Must insert exactly 1 affiliate link contextual in first or second paragraph using tag “Link_afiliado”. So we need to embed that link in either first or second paragraph. We’ll embed it in first paragraph. We need to ensure word count 180-320. Let’s aim for ~210 words. We need to produce only the first part of article: contextualization block, then the card highlight block HTML, then the rest? Actually the instruction: “Gere a primeira parte de um artigo analítico profissional para o produto “{{NOME_DO_PRODUTO}}”, seguindo rigorosamente as instruções e o modelo visual abaixo: 1. CONTEXTUALIZAÇÃO … 2. CARD DE DESTAQUE COM BOTÃO PERSONALIZADO … 3. EXPERIÊNCIA PRÁTICA…”. They ask to write the block based strictly on the provided directive, initiating obligatoriamente with the opening of a paragraph
of contextualização. Thus we need to output the entire block up to maybe the card? Or just the contextualization? The instruction says “Escreva o bloco baseado estritamente na diretriz fornecida acima, iniciando obrigatoriamente com a abertura de um parágrafo
de contextualização.” So we need to produce the whole block that includes contextualization, then the card block, then maybe the rest? But they said “primeira parte de um artigo analítico profissional”. The steps include contextualization, card highlight, then experience etc. But they only ask to generate the first part, which includes contextualization and card highlight? Actually step 1 is contextualization, step 2 is card highlight, step 3 is experience etc. They want to generate the first part of article, which likely includes contextualization and the card highlight (since those are the first two items). But they also say “Escreva o bloco baseado estritamente na diretriz fornecida acima, iniciando obrigatoriamente com a abertura de um parágrafo
de contextualização.” So we need to output the block that starts with
and includes the contextualization, then the card block, then maybe the experience part? But they said “primeira parte”. The first part likely includes contextualization and card highlight, maybe also the experience? Actually step 3 is “EXPERIÊNCIA PRÁTICA…” which is a longer section. That might be part of the article but maybe not part of the “first part”? The phrase “primeira parte de um artigo analítico profissional” suggests we should produce the whole article? But they gave a multi-step directive; maybe they want the entire article structured as per steps, but only the first part? Hard to know. The instruction says “Gere a primeira parte de um artigo analítico profissional para o produto “{{NOME_DO_PRODUTO}}”, seguindo rigorosamente as instruções e o modelo visual abaixo:” Then they list 1. CONTEXTUALIZAÇÃO, 2. CARD DE DESTAQUE…, 3. EXPERIÊNCIA PRÁTICA… So the first part likely includes all three steps? Or maybe they want to generate the entire article but only the first part of it? The phrase “primeira parte” suggests we should output the first segment of the article, which would be the contextualization plus the card highlight? But then step 3 is also part of the article; maybe they want to generate the whole article but only the first part (i.e., up to the experience section)? Actually step 3 is the main body; maybe they want the entire article but only the first part includes contextualization and card highlight? The instruction “Escreva o bloco baseado estritamente na diretriz fornecida acima, iniciando obrigatoriamente com a abertura de um parágrafo
de contextualização.” So we need to output a block that starts with
and includes the contextualization, then the card block, then maybe the experience part? But they said “primeira parte”. I think they want the whole article but only the first part (i.e., up to the experience section?) Not clear. Given typical tasks, they want to generate the entire article following the structure: contextualization, card highlight, then experience etc. But they ask “primeira parte”. Could be they want just the first part (contextualization + card). However they also mention “integrar naturalmente depoimentos reais extraídos do Reddit, Reclame Aqui ou avaliações de clientes.” That is part of the experience section. So that would be later. So the first part likely includes contextualization and card highlight only. But they also said “Escreva o bloco baseado estritamente na diretriz fornecida acima, iniciando obrigatoriamente com a abertura de um parágrafo
de contextualização.” So we need to output a block that starts with
and includes the contextualization, then the card block, then maybe end? Probably we should output up to the card block, maybe after that we can add some more paragraphs? But they said “primeira parte”. I think we should output the entire block that includes contextualization, then the card highlight, then maybe a transition to experience? But they said “primeira parte”. To be safe, I will output the entire structure up to the experience section? Actually they want the block based strictly on the directive, which includes all three steps. So we should output the whole block: contextualization paragraph(s), then the card HTML, then the experience section (with 4-6 blocks, depoimentos, visual components). But they said “primeira parte”. Might be they want just the first part of the article, which includes contextualization and card highlight, and maybe the experience part is later not included. However they also gave details for experience section, maybe they want to include it as part of the first part? The phrase “primeira parte de um artigo analítico profissional” could refer to the whole article being broken into parts; the first part includes all three steps? Actually the steps are enumerated as 1,2,3; maybe they represent sections of the article. So the first part could be We need to produce HTML only, following strict rules. Must not include intro, just go straight to info. Provide second part of article analytic professional for the product. Must be between 300-650 words. Must include public ideal, cost-benefit, editorial closing, FAQ, mini editorial, etc. Must vary between profile ideal, who probably not get benefit, common purchase errors, FAQ contextual, mini editorial. Must integrate a link contextual natural in the last paragraph using tag “Link_afiliado”. Must also produce CARD FINAL DE FECHAMENTO with the given HTML block adapted, containing 2 additional contextual links (one in each support paragraph) plus main button with tag “Link_afiliado”. Must use only allowed HTML tags:
,
,,- , ,
| , | ,
|
|---|